Ireland v. the United Kingdom: Separate Opinion of Judge O’Donoghue
On the findings of the Court summarized at pp. 94 to 96 of the judgment I share the unanimous views of my colleagues
Standards. Case Law. Approaches. Opinions
On the findings of the Court summarized at pp. 94 to 96 of the judgment I share the unanimous views of my colleagues
With respect, I subscribe to the main part of the judgment of the Court. I maintain, however, a different view as to the
1. Concerning the notion of torture (Article 3 of the Convention) (art. 3) According to the reasoning of the majority of the Court
The tragic and lasting crisis in Northern Ireland lies at the root of the present case. In order to combat what the respondent
The applicant alleged, in particular, that the strip searches to which he had been subjected while in detention at Lublin Remand Centre had
In its judgment in Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], 2015, the Grand Chamber adopted the following new principle as regards the ill-treatment of persons
The case concerns a violent attack on the applicants by Cossacks during an artistic performance by the applicants in Sochi on 19 February
The main issues in the present case are whether the removal of K.J., C.C., and S.K. to North Korea was or would be
1205. The applicant Government submitted that the respondent Government were responsible for administrative practices that amounted to a violation of Article 3 of
The application concerns the withdrawal of charges against an alleged perpetrator of rape, in view of errors that occurred at the Regional State