Ireland v. the United Kingdom (2018 revision)
The case originated in an application (no. 5310/71) lodged on 16 December 1971 with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) by the Government of Ireland
Ireland v. the United Kingdom: Separate Opinion of Judge Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice
1. On Articles 5 and 6 (and in consequence with reference to Articles 14 and 15), and also on Article 50, I voted
Ireland v. the United Kingdom: Separate Opinion of Judge O’Donoghue
On the findings of the Court summarized at pp. 94 to 96 of the judgment I share the unanimous views of my colleagues
Ireland v. the United Kingdom: Separate Opinion of Judge Zekia
With respect, I subscribe to the main part of the judgment of the Court. I maintain, however, a different view as to the
Ireland v. the United Kingdom: Separate Opinion of Judge Matscher
1. Concerning the notion of torture (Article 3 of the Convention) (art. 3) According to the reasoning of the majority of the Court
Ireland v. the United Kingdom: on the 50th Anniversary of the Tragic Events of the Conflict in Northern Ireland
The tragic and lasting crisis in Northern Ireland lies at the root of the present case. In order to combat what the respondent
Dejnek v. Poland: Strip Searches of a Prisoner
The applicant alleged, in particular, that the strip searches to which he had been subjected while in detention at Lublin Remand Centre had
The Minimum Level of Severity Test in Light of Bouyid v. Belgium
In its judgment in Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], 2015, the Grand Chamber adopted the following new principle as regards the ill-treatment of persons
Pulido v. Lunes et al: Compton Varrio Segundo (Suicide of a Prisoner Due to the Threat of Revenge from a Prison Gang)
Plaintiff is a state prisoner in the custody of CDCR, presently incarcerated at Corcoran State Prison, in Corcoran. The events giving rise to