Prevention of Torture Loading
Skip to content
Primary Menu
  • Home
  • Torture
  • Police
    • Méndez Principles
    • Fair Policing
  • Prisons
    • Penal Statistics
      • The Ukrainian Prison and Probation Policy (1991 – 2024): Modulations and Key Indicators
    • Human rights standards
      • Mandela Rules
    • Prison subculture
      • Prison Hierarchies. Facts. News. Research
  • Wartime Crisis Mode
  • Police Standards 2025
  • Articles
  • Categories
  • Home
  • Torture
  • Police
    • Méndez Principles
    • Fair Policing
  • Prisons
    • Penal Statistics
      • The Ukrainian Prison and Probation Policy (1991 – 2024): Modulations and Key Indicators
    • Human rights standards
      • Mandela Rules
    • Prison subculture
      • Prison Hierarchies. Facts. News. Research
  • Wartime Crisis Mode
  • Police Standards 2025
  • Articles
  • Categories
Prevention of Torture

Standards. Case Law. Approaches. Opinions

Day: 21 February 2025

  • Home
  • 2025
  • February
  • 21
#Case law #Council of Europe #Dmytro Yagunov #European Court of Human Rights #Ireland #Prevention of torture #Prison violence and torture #Torture #Torture prevention #United Kingdom #Victims of torture #Дмитро Ягунов

Ireland v. the United Kingdom (2018 Revision): Dissenting Opinion of Judge O’leary

21.02.202522.02.2025 By Yagunov

1.  Pursuant to Rule 80, the Court was requested to revise its judgment in Ireland v. the United Kingdom insofar as the latter found that, while

Continue Reading
comment
Load More Posts
Right to Liberty

Авторські права на структуру сайту та матеріалу сайту належать Дмитру Ягунову. Авторські права на зображення та фотографії належать авторам таких зображень та фотографій. Сайт жодним чином не відображає позицію Ради Європи, ЄКЗК або ЄСПЛ.

This site contains the opinions expressed solely by the author’s and does not reflect the opinions and official positions of the Council of Europe, the CPT or the ECtHR

Die Website spiegelt in keiner Weise die Position des Europarats, des Europäischen Komitees zur Verhütung von Folter oder des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte wider